Answer:
A wealth gap is an economic difference between- nations.
A wealth gap is an economic difference between nations. The biggest wealth gap in the world is in Suriname.
What do you mean by wealth gap?In contrast, the wage gap indicates the disparity in labor earnings across ethnic groups and races, the wealth gap explains the inequality in cumulative assets across races and ethnicities.
This imbalance is caused by inequalities in income and the accumulation of assets through generations.
The current racial wealth disparity is the result of several decades of racial inequality that imposed hurdles to wealth creation, either explicitly during slavery or by uneven treatment following freedom.
Inequality of wealth is not a negative thing. Wealth disparity, in fact, is a healthy and necessary component of a thriving economy. An economy with no wealth disparity will inevitably stagnate and perish, leaving widespread poverty in its wake.
Therefore, the correct option is A.
To know more about the wealth gap, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30185865
#SPJ5
When was the Emancipation Proclamation issued
Answer: January 1, 1863
Explanation:
Answer:
January 1, 1863
Explanation:
These history questions to easy read all of them in a textbook
PLEASEEEE HELP ILL GIVE A YOU A BRAINLY AWNSER Use the following words in a paragraph
about the Industrial Revolution.
capital free enterprise
technology factory system
What was one of the main questions that the war was fought over?
Answer:
Remember that you can always visit the Civil War Trust's website for a wealth of ... Battles were fought on people's private property. ... of battle. Often this would happen after major battles.
Answer:
private property
Explanation:
What concern did the U.S. have with cuba?
Which city is NOT considered a center of culture and trade in Sub-Saharan Africa?
A) Cairo
B) Johannesburg
C) Dakar
D) Lagos
Answer:
A
Explanation:K12
The city is NOT considered a center of culture and trade in Sub-Saharan Africa is Cairo. Thus the correct option is A.
What is trade?The term "trade" refers to the exchange of goods and services for cash in order to carry out an economic transaction. Trade that crosses international borders is referred to as international trade.
A culture is referred to be a collection of beliefs, traditions, values, customs, and rituals that people follow in communities in order to maintain the possessions of their ancestors.
Cairo is well known for being the hub of the political and cultural life of the region demonstrating political viewpoint in the territory, hence it is not regarded as a center of culture and trade in Sub-Saharan Africa.
Therefore, option A is appropriate.
Learn more about Culture, here:
https://brainly.com/question/17251800
#SPJ6
Why was sharecropping so common in the Cotton Belt?
A. It was a successful system that allowed tenant farmers to quickly acquire their own farms.
B. Labor shortages in the region promoted this system.
C. Unable to purchase their own land, many former slaves became sharecroppers.
D. Immigrants who were used to similar systems in Europe found comfort in this system, which
provided them the opportunity to own plots of land.
C
Pog Pog Pog Pog Pog Pog Pog Pog Pog Pog
Answer:C. Unable to purchase their own land, many former slaves became sharecroppers.
Explanation:I just answered the question
Why do the Progressives believe that the separation of powers and checks and balances were unnecessary?
The Constitution of the United States was initially very controversial. Opponents feared it gave far too much power to the federal government and nearly blocked its ratification.
Today, the great document is revered by most Americans, but there is growing opposition to our Constitutional system. The 21st century opposition comes from the opposite direction: Progressives believe “rigid adherence to past versions of limited government (must) be discarded.” They want a far more powerful federal government and governing bureaucracy.
It’s important to recognize that the progressive challenge to the Constitution is not merely about the size of government. It’s not about how much money they want to spend on new government programs. Whenever sustainable and broad public support is found for such programs, these “big government” views can easily be accommodated within the Constitutional structure.
That wouldn’t surprise the founders of our nation at all. They clearly understood that the power of government could sometimes be used to further the public good.
But the founders also recognized that there was another reality to consider. As James Madison put it in Federalist 41, any “power to advance the public happiness involves a discretion that may be misapplied and abused.” Their struggle to find the right balance was eloquently expressed by Madison in Federalist 51:
“If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary. In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself.”
The problem, simply put, is human nature. If you give someone power, sooner or later it will have a corrupting influence on them.
The solution arrived at in our Constitution was to create a powerful government, but to separate its powers so no one person or faction could wield that power alone. There would be checks and balances throughout the system, a precaution Madison viewed as “necessary to control the abuses of government.”
The Madisonian system of checks and balances has served our nation well, but it is deeply frustrating to many progressives today. From the progressive perspective, Constitutional checks and balances represent a messy and inefficient process that blocks decisive government action.
Their analysis is correct.
It’s embarrassing at times when the separation of powers is displayed in a public spat between House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and President Donald Trump. Disheartening as such displays may be, the ugly competition prevents either from unilaterally imposing their views on the nation. That’s what Madison had in mind when he wrote that “Ambition must be made to counteract ambition.”
Progressives are also right that our system of checks and balances can be inefficient. Congress and the president often disagree. So do the House and Senate. And then the courts get involved. Sometimes there are challenges from state governments. The entire process slows things down and generates more modest results.
Much to the chagrin of progressives, that’s the whole idea. The messiness and inefficiency are features not bugs. Because government power can be used for both good and evil, the Constitution requires leaders to build a broad public consensus before that power can be unleashed.
For those who want more government power unleashed, that is a fundamental problem with our Constitution. A pair of law professors from Harvard and Chicago — Eric A. Posner and Adrian Vermeule — believe concern about checks and balances stems from an irrational American “fear of dictatorship.” They call it “tyrannophobia” and are upset that such attitudes were “reflected in the Declaration of Independence and founding debates.”
Not surprisingly, these scholars dismiss Madison’s system as an irrelevant “historical curiosity.” What concerns them is not a fear that government power will be abused. Instead, they worry that lingering “tyrannophobia” is preventing our nation from turning over enough power to presidents and bureaucrats.
It is hard to imagine a more fundamental rejection of our Constitutional order.
Scott Rasmussen is an American political analyst and digital media entrepreneur. He is the author of “The Sun is Still Rising: Politics Has Failed But America Will Not.”
If you want more information just look up your question on the internet and read some articles.
What change resulted when North Carolina adopted a new constitution in 1971?
B. The governors power increased because the governor could appoint department heads
In what ways did music reflect Enlightenment ideals
Composers also felt they had a moral obligation to provide fine music for the common people. This idea, and the general concept that the Enlightenment could challenge tradition, opened up composers to a much greater range of artistic freedom.
when was the decleration of independence made?
Answer:
July 4, 1776
Explanation:
July 4, 1776 was when the Declaration of Independence was adopted by the Continental Congress.
In the Electoral College system, the number of electoral votes each state gets is equivalent
to:
the number of members the state has in the House of Representatives.
the number of voters who are registered in the state.
the number of members the state has in the Senate.
the number of members the state has in both houses of Congress.
Answer:
the number of members the state has in both houses of Congress.Explanation:
Answer:
the number of members the state has in both houses of congress.
Explanation:
give me brainlist please!
what branch of government can override a presidential veto with 2/3 majority vote
Answer:
Congress can.
Explanation:
I don't have an explanation for this- ._.
describe the difference between real gdp and nominal gdp.
Answer:
Explanation:
The main difference between nominal GDP and real GDP is the adjustment for inflation. Since nominal GDP is calculated using current prices, it does not require any adjustments for inflation.
Answer:
Difference between Real GDP and Nominal GDP is the adjustment for inflation.
I need the answer because I am confused
Answer:
seven years in the us
Explanation:
bc ik it
I need it ASAP. Solve it please!!
[tex] {z}^{3} - 8i = 0[/tex]
I'll do it later cuz busy
What visual features or thematic treatments of females are notable?
Answer:
i know
Explanation:
The female gaze is a feminist film theoretical term representing the gaze of the female viewer. ... In contemporary usage, the female gaze has been used to refer to the perspective a female filmmaker (screenwriter/director/producer) brings to a film that would be different from a male view of the subject.
Why does Clinton talk about the national debt even though his administration did not pay it down?
Check all of the boxes that apply.
❌He feels his administration has made enough progress on the debt.
✅He wants to tell people what good will come from erasing the debt.
✅He is setting a challenge for the next administration.
Answer:
B and C
Explanation:
The reasons why Clinton spoke on national debt was:
He wants to tell people what good will come from erasing the debt.He is setting a challenge for the next administration.Why did Clinton speak on national debt?President Clinton's administration did not reduce the national debt but he still wanted this to be done by the next administration.
He therefore spoke on the issue to show people why national debt should be reduced to encourage the next administration to do so.
Find out more on President Clinton at https://brainly.com/question/12956736.
#SPJ2
How significant were President Reagan's policies in ending the Cold War?
Answer:
Reagan persued Détente, or demilitarization with the Soviet Union, signing the SALT 1 treaty with Leonid Brezhnev.
Explanation:
Italy was a collection of independent city-states for the following
reasons, chose the correct one
A they had not voted to become united and elect a king
B one city-state wanted all the power for themselves and took land from the others
Cthey had no emperors or kings, fought often, were equally strong, and independent
due to riches
D Italy was weak and had little money
Answer: C. they had no emperors or kings, fought often, were equally strong, and independent
due to riches
Explanation:
Italy before unification in the 1800s was a place divided. There existed various City states that held sway over large tracts of territory.
These city states were independent and saw their power increase in direct proportion to their wealth which enabled them to be independent.
These states fought for control alot but none prevailed enough to establish a country wide unification until the 19th century.
In 1413 what king of England died
Answer:
Henry of Monmouth
Explanation:
Why is political participation key in keeping minority and majority factions in check?
Answer:
Majority rule with respect to minority rights is vital to a democratic government. This process allows for citizens to maintain individual rights while following the direction of the majority. It also allows for the citizens to make changes to the laws as society, the majorities, and the minorities change.
Why does the Institute for Liberty and Democracy fight for property rights and the rule of law?
To protect the interests of wealthy landowners
To enable the poor to benefit from capitalism
Answer:
To enable the poor to benefit from capitalism
Explanation:
I will mark you brainlist!
what are the different tyoe of atternative energy sources?
Answer:
air, electrical, solar, water, battery
Explanation:
C - Judaism and Christianity share a belief in one God and an afterlife, but only Christians believe
that
D. The New Testament should not be included in the Bible
C all people are equal in God's eyes
A. Jesus is the son of God
B Canaan was the Promised Land
Answer:
The answer is A, Jesus is the son of God.
Explanation:
People who follow Judaism believe that the "Messiah" will still come in the future, and that Jesus didn't exist/was just a regular man. Christians see Jesus as God's son and as somebody who was sent to save humanity.
Reflective of the intense productivity of manufacturers like the Tulsa Douglas Plant, __________ manufacturing became a tremendous new industry for Oklahomans during and after World War II. A. explosives B. textile C. aerospace D. agribusiness
Answer:
Answer is C
Explanation:
EDG2021
good morning i hope you have good day today can you please help out
Answer:
I think A
Explanation:
It's the only one that makes cence to me, I mean what other reason than gaining power is a reason to down fall a politician.
Answer:
The answer is A
Explanation:
3. Summarize the most important reasons why governments are formed. Your summary should include descriptions of how societies are
improved by the existence of governments.
Plz help ASAP!
Answer: People form governments in order to maintain social order, have protection from predators, and provide collective goods.
and
Governments provide the parameters for everyday behavior for citizens, protect them from outside interference, and often provide for their well-being and happiness. In the last few centuries, some economists and thinkers have advocated government control over some aspects of the economy.
Explanation:
According to Nixon, which of the following occurred under his leadership?
Check all of the boxes that apply.
New jobs created
Trade with China avoided
Crime rate decreased
Political organization to protect the environment created
Relations with the Soviet Union improved
Troops removed from Vietnam
Answer:
relations with the sovient union improved
[tex] \huge \boxed{\mathbb{QUESTION} \downarrow}[/tex]
According to Nixon, which of the following occurred under his leadership?
Check all of the boxes that apply.
a. New jobs created
b. Trade with China avoided
c. Crime rate decreased
d. Political organization to protect the environment created
e. Relations with the Soviet Union improved
f. Troops removed from Vietnam
[tex] \huge \boxed{\mathfrak{Answer} \downarrow}[/tex]
According Nixon, the following happened under his leadership :-
New jobs were created.The crime rated decreased.Political organizations to protect the environment were created.Relations with the Soviet Union improved.Troops were removed from Vietnam.⇨ So, the correct options are :- a, c, d, e & f.
Do you
think states should have the right to nullify a
federal law?
No link please
Answer:
The theory of nullification has never been legally upheld by federal courts. ... Therefore, the power to make final decisions about the constitutionality of federal laws lies with the federal courts, not the states, and the states do not have the power to nullify federal laws... :)
Explanation:
Why do Senators have the ability to block hearings for Presidential appointments?
Answer:
Article II, Section 2, of the Constitution provides that the President shall appoint officers of the United States “by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate.” This report describes the process by which the Senate provides advice and consent on presidential nominations, including receipt and referral of nominations, committee practices, and floor procedure.
Committees play the central role in the process through investigations and hearings. Senate Rule XXXI provides that nominations shall be referred to appropriate committees “unless otherwise ordered.” Most nominations are referred, although a Senate standing order provides that some “privileged” nominations to specified positions will not be referred unless requested by a Senator. The Senate rule concerning committee jurisdictions (Rule XXV) broadly defines issue areas for committees, and the same jurisdictional statements generally apply to nominations as well as legislation. A committee often gathers information about a nominee either before or instead of a formal hearing. A committee considering a nomination has four options. It can report the nomination to the Senate favorably, unfavorably, or without recommendation, or it can choose to take no action. It is more common for a committee to take no action on a nomination than to reject a nominee outright.
According to Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution, the President is required to appoint federal officers "by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate."
What is a president?The president is the title that was given to the head of the state of republics. The president of a country is, generally speaking, the head of the government and the first harmonic leader of the country or the ceremonial occasion head of state.
In this report, the mechanism for receiving and referring nominations, committee practices, and floor procedure are all described in relation to how the Senate gives advice and consent on presidential nominations.
Therefore, the President is required to appoint federal officers "by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate."
Learn more about the president here:
https://brainly.com/question/497462
#SPJ2